Serhat Do?an; Bahad?r Onde?; Nizamettin Kutluer; Selim Sozen; Hasan Erdem; Ali Aksu; Ahmet Ayd?n
Volume 25, Issue 3 , 2023
Abstract
Background: There is no standard method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Today, many different treatment methods are attempted. Some of the leading methods are surgical procedures with different flap techniques and less invasive methods, such as crystallized phenol, laser pilonidoplasty, ...
Read More
Background: There is no standard method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Today, many different treatment methods are attempted. Some of the leading methods are surgical procedures with different flap techniques and less invasive methods, such as crystallized phenol, laser pilonidoplasty, radiofrequency excision, and monopolar electrocautery excision.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the monopolar and bipolar electrocautery excision techniques that we performed in our clinic for PSD.
Methods: Patients who received pilonidal sinus treatment in our clinic between January 2018 and January 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The exclusion criteria were diabetes mellitus, renal failure, immunosuppression, and children (<16 years of age). The study included a total of 36 patients who met the criteria. Data were retrospectively obtained from hospital archive records (operative notes, discharge summary, and outpatient dressing records). The patients were then divided into two groups, namely monopolar electrocautery excision (group 1) and bipolar electrocautery excision (group 2).
Results: The mean age of 36 patients included in the study was 22.9 years. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of predisposing factors (gender, obesity, hirsutism, and smoking). There was also no statistical difference in terms of mean healing time and recurrence rate. Monopolar and bipolar electrocautery excisions lasted 32.2±8.9 and 38.8±7.8 minutes, respectively (P<0.05). Accordingly, the operative time was significantly different between the groups, and it was shorter in the monopolar electrocautery excision group. Furthermore, the bipolar electrocautery group showed shorter wound infection duration, compared to the monopolar electrocautery excision group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Both excision techniques were similar in terms of wound healing, hospital stay, and recurrence rates. The operative times were longer in bipolar cautery; however, the wound infection was less.
Nizamettin Kutluer; Serhat Do?an; Ali Aksu; Hakan Ayy?ld?z; Mehmet Kalayc?; Zuhal Karaca Karagoz; Zeynep Ozkan; Burhan Hakan Kanat
Volume 24, Issue 2 , 2022
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy is the most common type of surgical treatment for morbid obesity. One of the most important complications is leakage from the stapler line. Early detection of a leakage is important in preventing undesirable events.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to ...
Read More
Background: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy is the most common type of surgical treatment for morbid obesity. One of the most important complications is leakage from the stapler line. Early detection of a leakage is important in preventing undesirable events.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of postoperative drain fluid pH on early detection of leakage.
Methods: This study was performed with 63 patients including 33 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (Group SG) and 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group LC), as the control group. Fluid sample was obtained after surgery with intra-abdominal drain. The pH value of this fluid was measured using a pH meter at the Ohaus device in the biochemistry laboratory of study hospital.
Results: When the differences in the mean pH values of patients who underwent obesity surgery and gallbladder surgery were evaluated; no statistically significant difference was found between the mean pH value of patients (p: 0.808> 0.05).
Conclusion: None of our patient had leakage and unable to demonstrate how would be the drain fluid pH value if there was a leak, we suggest that drain fluid pH would not be a suitable alarming sign for a leakage in the early period. Because we know that most of the leaks occur at the proximal part of the stomach and that there is more saliva drainage through the line of leakage. Although it is known that the acidic fluid of the stomach can be drained from the same leak in this condition, it is not unlikely that saliva can bring the pH to normal levels. Therefore, if the pH of the drain fluid is close to normal, it is meaning that there is no leakage from the site.
